Friday, 15 January 2010
Tesco Tear-aways
Tesco is challenging the legal battle it lost against Sainsbury’s over a multi-million pound plan to revamp the Great Homer Street area. The company will seek a review of the decision which favoured its rivals to open a supermarket as part of the £150m Project Jennifer scheme.
Last night, developers St Modwen and Liverpool Council, who are working with Sainsbury’s on the initiative, hit out at Tesco, saying it had caused yet another delay to the scheme.
Regeneration leader Cllr Peter Millea said Tesco was putting its commercial interests ahead of one of the city’s most important projects.
Tesco hit back in the war of words, saying it “categorically rejected” the claims and that it had a strong track record of delivery in Liverpool.
Tesco had originally been in talks with developers St Modwen and brought legal action to try to proceed with its own plans in the area.
In December, a planning inspector ruled in favour of the city council, which had rejected Tesco’s scheme for a 27,000 sq ft superstore and indoor and outdoor markets. http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2010/01/15/liverpool-city-council-accuses-tesco-of-damaging-regeneration-of-city-92534-25606102/
Maybe the council should do a facebook site that stopped them last time. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/09/tescopool-power-to-people.html Maybe they should set Bernie Turner loose on them whose Old Swan ward has a massive Tesco http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/08/berni-turner-opens-her-big-gob-again.html
Sir Terry Leahy who was born in Liverpool wants to own it. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search/label/Tesco-pool%20the%20new%20name%20for%20Liverpool
Tesco-pool the new name for Liverpool http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/08/tesco-pool-invasion-of-business.html Unless someone at the council decides to shop at another supermarket that is.
Monday, 6 April 2009
TESCO-POOL
Very Cosy……….TESCO-TACTICS...TESCO-POOL.
http://www.liverpoolvision.co.uk/aboutus/board.asp
3 Oct 2008 ... TESCO boss Sir Terry Leahy told a Liverpool business audience yesterday that staying close to customers is key to surviving the current ...
www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/business/business-local/2008/10/03/leahy-tells-how-to-survive-economic-downturn-64375-21955406/
Tesco plan approved for Liverpool’s largest supermarket
Feb 25 2009 By David Bartlett, Liverpool Daily Post
LIVERPOOL’S biggest supermarket is to be built in Toxteth, in the largest private sector investment in the area since the riots.
Tesco has promised to offer at least half of the 500 jobs that will be created to local long-term unemployed people.
The supermarket hopes to start construction of the £30m store on the former Mecca bingo hall, in Park Road, by September.
The plans, which were approved by Liverpool’s planning committee yesterday, will also see £600,000 spent improving the local environment.
Riverside ward councillor Steve Munby said the store would provide much-needed regeneration for the area.
He said: “This is fantastic news.
“At present, the site is desolate, but now we will have 500 jobs moving into Liverpool 8 at the start of a recession.”
The store is being built using the Tesco’s “Regeneration Partnership” model, working with local agencies like the Plus Dane Group.
Deborah Hayeems, regional corporate affairs manager for Tesco, said: “We are excited to get going with the regeneration partnership.
“We are already working with Job Centre Plus to get people ready for jobs.
“It is a dynamic community but an area with high unemployment, so we are ring-fencing half the jobs for long-term unemployed.” The proposed store will occupy 9,571 square metres, with 537 parking spaces and a petrol station.
The site will be able to house several small retail units, including a community cafe, while the current buildings will be demolished.
Planning chairman Cllr Dave Irving said: “It’s a massive store, far bigger than I am happy with.
“But you have to take into account the regeneration of the area.”
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2009/02/25/toxteth-will-be-home-of-the-liverpool-s-largest-supermarket-after-tesco-plan-is-approved-by-city-council-92534-23004581/
IS LIVERPOOL TURNING INTO A GIANT TESCO.... HAVE THEY GOT THE PLANNERS TIED UP WITH THEIR TESCO-TACTICS...ARE THEY TAKING OVER THE CITY WITH THIER TESCO-TACTICS.
HOW MANY MORE SMALL BUSINESSES ARE TO GO POP BECAUSE OF........ TESCO-TACTICS.
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2008/11/29/tesco-angry-at-planning-delays-over-new-store-64375-22365617/
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/search.cfm?cof=FORID%3A11&q=tesco&cref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.liverpooldailypost.co.uk%2Fgoogle_coop.xml&client=pub-6059318011805114&sa=Search#1055
search results for Tesco in the local press
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2009/03/30/tesco-applies-to-work-on-destination-kirkby-site-before-everton-fc-stadium-given-go-ahead-92534-23261571/
30.3.09
Wednesday, 3 August 2011
Do We Need Another Tesco In James Street.
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
Tesco Opens a Store In Liverpool's World Heritage Site.
http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2010/01/travelodge-for-liverpools-world.html Then to make the matter worse in the Travelodge, is going to be a Tesco...........Every Little Hurts, but this is killing me.
You have to question the mentality of those who oversee planning blight in Liverpool. Lets show the world how you look after a world heritage site, and then you trash it.
http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2010/01/tesco-tear-aways.html Tesco tear-aways will we see the mumbies who fought to stop Tesco opening ion their beloved Hope Street. No We think not.
In December 2009 a big fuss occurred In a planning inspector ruled in favour of the city council, which had rejected Tesco’s scheme for a 27,000 sq ft superstore and indoor and outdoor markets after a major public outcry. http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2010/01/15/liverpool-city-council-accuses-tesco-of-damaging-regeneration-of-city-92534-25606102/
Tesco-pool the new name for Liverpool?
http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/08/tesco-pool-invasion-of-business.html Unless someone at the council decides to shop at another supermarket that is.
World Heritage S#ite.
Friday, 27 November 2009
Cheeky Evertonian Monkey's.
Only in Liverpool would millions of pounds of public money have been wasted on allowing Tesco to effectively take control of a football club by bankrolling the move to Kirkby on the Merseyside periphery in fact in the borough of Knowsley. They would have had to change the name of the club to Tesco-ton and have a sock as an emblem breaking all those years of tradition, it wasnt right. How much has been spent of our cash on this.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2009/11/26/everton-fc-s-kirkby-project-how-the-stadium-fight-was-won-and-lost-100252-25255948/
It was said that the whole scheme to turn Kirkby civic centre into a giant Tesco, (who own the centre now) was deemed detrimental to the local economy. The fallout ahead of this decision may have been instrumental in the company abandoning its outlet for the ultra sensitive Hope Street.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23184426/09-11-25-IR-Everton-FC-and-Tesco-1203375 The government report was entitled Everton and Tesco. The Chief exec of Tesco Sir Terry Leahy is a lifelong Everton supporter. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search/label/Tesco-pool%20the%20new%20name%20for%20Liverpool
Are they, Tesco, taking over the country.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2009/11/26/everton-fc-destination-kirkby-views-from-the-liverpoolecho-co-uk-forums-100252-25256330/
What is more worrying for most Evertonians is how they will live up to expectations this Sunday in the local Derby when they play the most successful club in English footballing history, Liverpool. Even more worrying being fourth from bottom in the table is why a new stadium needs to be built for a team on the cusp of relegation anyhow. They are now calling for investment. What about buying a few players not a town centre.
And now they want our ground again.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2009/11/26/everton-legend-joe-royle-convinced-a-shared-stadium-with-liverpool-is-best-way-forward-100252-25263739/
Reich marshal Nigel Lee the chief planner of disaster in Liverpool said he wanted Goodison listed and Warren Bradley another toffee nose will be upset. Not about the public money wasted but his own face.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news//tm_headline=everton-fc-ready-for-talks-on-shared-stadium-but-liverpool-fc-set-to-go-it-alone%26method=full%26objectid=25264688%26siteid=100252-name_page.html
Pages and pages of it all over the local papers Mark Thomas a Evertonian while Alistair MaCrazy supports himself, has seen to that, it is a shame they could not have made the same fuss when the world heritage site was being destroyed. Sarah Wilde of Trinity "Smoking" Mirrors was a member of Liverpool Visions board who helped to destroy the Pier Head with carbuncle after carbuncle. Why?
Thursday, 20 August 2009
Tescopool- The Invasion of the Business Snatchers
We all lined up to argue about recent planning applications that most thought would destroy the character of Hope Street watching facades being wrecked right in front of the Council Planning departments noses, and now the rot is to set in big time. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search?q=hope+street
The proposals were for. A massive development opposite to the Art Nouveau Philharmonic public house, originally a hotel. We thought it was out of keeping with the Phil, with its stepped gables and turrets, balconies and oriels designed by Walter Thomas (1898-1900). They just didnt seem to fit in but now we have plans to plonk next door, a shop selling plonk........ a Tesco-Express. Advertised in the last weeks Sunday Times as a place to come and see Liverpool's Culture proclaiming it almost as a separate entity the city the advertisement said Hope Street has Great Architecture, Two Cathedrals, Great hotels and Restaurants mixed with amazing culture by the North West Tourist Board and now its well and truly buggered for any one wanting to set up a small enterprise because Tesco are to illuminate the street.
I wrote some time ago about the strangle-hold of Tesco on Liverpool. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search?q=tesco-pool (Well before Larry "The Lamb" Neild plagiarised what I wrote, I think, he still thinks he is on the Daily Ghost staff and can take other peoples thoughts). http://www.liverpoolconfidential.com/index.asp?Sessionx=IpqiNwEiNwEmIDP6IHqjNwB6IA
I wrote about the Belle Vale boy of Liverpool Vision helping Tescopilise Britain. Hilary Burridge of the Hope Street wallers and the Merseyside "waste of a good name" Civic Society seems to be well connected with Liverpool Vision, she writes so lyrically to them and often, and in the correspondence I have seen, fondly making suggestions to them. So what will she do about this?.........nothing probably just get a wagon load of publicity for herself and her Friend Louise Ellman.
Steve Mumby who is out of his medical closet does not even represent this ward. But scenting the publicity hes off on one. I admire people having a go, but what will he do?.....Nothing Probably,.
He has two Hopes of stopping this.........No Hope and Bob!
The shelves are as good as stacked they have all the power.
David Bartlett writes
TESCO has announced plans to open an Express store in Liverpool’s historic Hope Street, generating extensive opposition.
The supermarket giant has applied for permission to put up an illuminated sign in a unit next to the Philharmonic Dining Rooms pub.
As the premises is designated an A3 category use, allowing for a cafe or restaurant, it can be changed to A1 – a shop – without planning permission.
Campaigners hope that opposition to the signs proposed by Tesco will help force a rethink. http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2009/08/20/tesco-store-plan-for-liverpool-s-hope-street-sparks-controversy-92534-24484865/
It is not just happening here Nemisis writes with the usual informative reasoning about it on their blog of recent days. http://nemesisrepublic.blogspot.com/2009/08/every-little-hurts.html
http://www.tescopoly.org/ Today's Guardian has an article by George Monbiot on the planned Tesco on the outskirts of his small Welsh town.My town is menaced by a superstore. So why are we not free to fight it off?People know a Tesco will suck the marrow from us. Yet the decision is left in the hands of a remote and frightened council...http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/aug/10/tesco-planning-superstore-independent-shops
Wednesday, 7 October 2009
Berni Turner-And a Tin of Sardines
Liverpool City Councillors expenses are laid right open by a freedom of information act request by the Green Party.http://liverpool.greenparty.org.uk/council%20business/councillors%20expenses.htm
Here are your counclillors expenses available for the public to see, and it makes interesting reading.
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news/2009/10/06/a-tin-of-sardines-tesco-sarnies-and-a-bill-for-a-christmas-day-meeting-we-reveal-city-councillors-expenses-claims-100252-24859499/
Some councillors had claims rejected because their position at the council had changed and they were no longer entitled to them .
Cllr Steve Hurst had around £35 of claims rejected after his resignation as executive member for corporate performance.
The comments on the form referred to his resignation and his claims were for duties “no longer approved”.
Hurst said he was still carrying out the duties because he had not been replaced but that he “decided not to challenge them because I was suffering from depression during this time and felt this would only make matters worse”. He has an excuse for everything, even after he is convicted this bloke still gets support, and it all adds up to show the sad state of affairs and the Culture of Capital at the council.
Cllr Hurst had resigned following his conviction under the Representation of the People Act after being caught distributing leaflets smearing a Labour rival.
In total, councillors had £643 worth of travel and food expenses claims rejected in the last year.
SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON.
Big Mouth Berni is off again. She styles herself as a Heritage Champion but will not reply to questions that she does not wish to answer like the 46 listed buildings lost and the buildings falling over whilst the world heritage site is destroyed with empty flats. But when she does its usually abusive. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/08/berni-turner-opens-her-big-gob-again.htmlBut this time its brine going into her mouth instead of coming out of it. Liberal Democrat member said she no longer planned to claim for subsistence food expenses following her experience with a £1.69 tin of sardines from Waitrose.
Cllr Berni Turner said that she had bought the fish along with her other shopping while busy at the council one day, but did not want to hand over the receipt for her entire shop. (Sure it wasnt from Tesco Berni.) Turner recently got in trouble after she said that Sir Terry Leahy from Tescos ran an evil empire.
But that wasn’t good enough for council expenses scrutineers.
Cllr Turner said: “I did not have an individual receipt for this tin of sardines, so in the end I had to cut the outer wrapper off the tin in order to claim. I bought them, ate them and then ended up having to clip the thing to the expenses form to prove I’d purchased them. In the end I thought can I be bothered doing all this for this? I can’t.” http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/08/lets-take-sentimental-journey-with.html
What an absolute embarrasment.Here is one of her expense claims.
You know you would be too ashamed to claim for a tin of sardines. To even think you get paid by the public for eating, does she not have to eat anyhow.
Cllr Ron Gould, executive member for health, learned while attending the opening of a new supermarket in Liverpool that the phrase “every little helps” is not in city accountants’ vocabulary. He had a claim for £1.60 for a sandwich knocked back while standing in for council leader Cllr Warren Bradley at the opening of a city centre Tesco.
Cllr Gould insisted his claim was legitimate, despite it being knocked back.
“I was asked to go to the opening of the Tesco as the date had been brought forward, so the date I opened it was not the date the council official had. I was in town all morning so I bought a sandwich, but they knocked it back. But I’m not going to go to war over it, it’s just one of those things.”
Warren Bradley intends going to the opening of new Tescos while they are taking over the city, hum, hum. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search/label/Tesco-pool
You know the whole way that these people behave leaves me amazed and very disapointed to be represented by such a bunch of penny pinchers.
No mention of Trevor Jones expenses though. Isnt that a shame.
Monday, 7 September 2009
Tescopool-Power to the People

Monday, 6 January 2014
Mayor Joe Anderson fails To Deliver.
India Buildings is in the World Heritage Site.
It is he who has got Liverpool stuffed onto the UNESCO World Heritage In Danger List.
A petition, that a thousand of Liverpool’s citizens signed, was hand delivered to the Municipal Buildings where he has his office.
Its hard enough trying to keep tab of the planners at the best of times but leading up to Xmas is exceptionally difficult.
India Buildings had been upgraded from Grade II to Grade II* by English Heritage after an application by the c20 society, such is its architectural significance.
http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/a-star-for-india-buildings-english.html
The original planning application 13L/2472 had been withdrawn because of the listing upgrade.
So our Dictator, who was voted in by 16% of the electorate of Liverpool has a mandate to run the planning department how he wishes.
He can push his influence in where he likes.
This will be very beneficial to his friends at Downtown Liverpool, whose members seem to get preferential treatment by the planners.
Liz Blake dealing with the application had failed to notify shopkeepers of Holts Arcade and any tenant of India Buildings about an application to restrict access and alter the character of this majestic edifice that is loved by the people of Liverpool. What would be the state of play when you realise your neighbour could be building a 10 storey block of flats and you get to know about it when the JCB's arrive to dig the foundations.
The 1000 name petition was gathered with ease, such was their concern of the public about plans by Green Property, who last year told the tenants that they wanted to close one of the doors off, thus breaking an ancient right of way and converting the shops to offices. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/green-property-issue-statement-on-india.html
Holts Arcade is the Burlington Arcade of the north its travertine lined arcade with its bronze fixtures make it unique.
This is of great concern to, not only the people of Liverpool but all who care for World Heritage.
English Heritage asked for the original application 13L/2472 to be withdrawn. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/plans-to-alter-india-buildings.html
So the applicant with the help of the planners amend it splitting the same application into thirds and resubmit two thirds of it again. One third in some coded revised plan that you would need a degree in navigation to find on the council website. Of course that is if you are looking because no letters were sent out to the public, so you wouldn't know about it, unless you stumbled on the rag-arsed piece of paper that some council operative put on the lampost just as we had a blizzard and it was unreadable.
Lets make no mistake here, in our opinion, these planners are not looking after the interests of Liverpudlians, they work with the developers to get plans passed. They are ignorant to the needs of the public. They have two functions . To accept an application and to pass an application.
Liz Blake is particularly ignorant in our opinion. But she is not unique at the planning department.
Just who gives them the authority to abuse the power they possess, to disrespect the public who pay their wages. And all the while they are faceless and answer to themselves.
Democracy does not matter. This suits developers especially the ones such as the fraudsters who were given St Andrews Church, which is Grade I for a quid.
http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/plans-to-alter-india-buildings.html
Dealing with Liverpool's planning managers, in general, in our opinion, is like dealing with sharks . They have the law behind them. And unlimited legal advice.
But that does not make it llegal what they do. Largely they go unchallenged in city where less than 30% turn out to vote for a Mayor.
We have a great deal of experience dealing with the planners and we can say the we always find them well mannered. And all the time when they are well mannered they are kicking you in the balls.
It is similar to playing cards with a cheat, who has another deck under the table.
And you say to them there are five aces on the table and the arrogant shyster says “Yes and they are all mine” and you cant do nothing because they own the joint.
They, as a benefit to the developers are hiding cards and, well basicly they are cheats.
It does not matter if they are within the law. They cheat.
This is why Liverpool’s heritage is in such a bad state.
And the Mayor encourages it.
This is why Liverpool is turning into Tesco-pool and the character of the city is being eroded.
This is why India Buildings has gone from 75% occupancy level to 20% since Green Property have owned it.
They at the planning dept with no cohesive strategy allowed to be built block after block of sterile office space in the Old Hall street district. They are even calling that area the business district now. To the detriment of Water Street which was built as the business district. They now have to give out 5 year rent free deals to fill this space in Old hall Street. Thus the mass migration from Liverpool’s historic structures such as the Port of Liverpool, The Liver Buildings and Martins Bank Buildings.
This has been bad for India Buildings the owners did not want to compete and let the tenants go.
So without our work in protecting this space in helping to upgrade its listing it would not be a public space. Without us alerting the public it would be closed.
So as concerned citizens we get together a petition deliver it to the Mayor.
We play the process honestly, even though we know its corrupt and stacked in favour of arrogant planning managers.
Joe Anderson failed to deliver the petition.
The planning department is only three doors away from his office and the plans were passed by delegated powers in a sleight of hand by Liz Blake that looks more like dodgy dealing than a democratic process.
Did Joe Anderson with hold the petition on purpose?
This is outrageous at no time was it spelt out by Blake that delegated powers were to be used.
To think we fought two world wars to be able to have democracy and Andersons storm-troopers in the planning department, in their brown shirts, run roughshod all over it.
All those people giving their time up for democracy and Herr Fuhrer Joe Anderson has removed the democratic process.
It is an abuse of power sanctioned by the Mayor.
What a disgrace his office has proved to be.
We now have now made an official complaint. To Herr Anderson the Mayor.
We will let you know what he says.
Monday, 24 August 2009
Grosvenor-pool the new name for Liverpool.
It is now stated that Grosvenor have bought the old Rapid Hardware and Rapid have now moved to the old John Lewis store as part of a deal. Rapid used to be claiming the biggest shopfront in the city, this will now be broken up. (Incidentally Larry Neild used to be Rapids publicist I was informed with a direct route into the local papers).
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2009/08/20/liverpool-one-developer-grosvenor-buys-old-rapid-hardware-site-100252-24490295/
I see no evidence presented with this article as to price or land registry details of completion so there is a chance that the kid who wrote it just packaged a bundle up for a Grosvenor PR company or the council. Alistair Houghton wrote; Grosvenor’s projects director Guy Butler said Grosvenor had no firm plans for the site itself but was talking to two interested parties about their "exciting plans" for it. What did they buy it for then???????????
Time will tell what they are talking about. But will they let another big retail centre happen?
WILL IT BE A TESCO? Was there to be a new Central Village planned in this area? So what has happened to that?
What is happening here is with the centre of power changing and a new footfall being found in the city centre, It seems Grosvenor are now able to dictate to the council outside of Grosvenor-pool by owning the land around their existing gifted domain. Are they now taking over the city.
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2008/03/13/180m-liverpool-central-village-scheme-set-to-start-in-autumn-64375-20617750/ Time will tell.
http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2007/11/08/lewis-s-store-at-heart-of-30m-liverpool-development-64375-20078760/
Liverpool has seen so many small independent retailers and business's go to the wall.
First we had the city centre dug up for years to facilitate Grosvenor who opened up their new retail empire at the start of the biggest recession since the 30s and it now seems they are able to dictate any new developments that threaten them. What happened to all those fledgling businesses in the old Quiggins.
If you read the local papers with its current attitude everything is rosy but below the surface so many mistakes have been made turning our city into something that resembles any other with its homogenisation of the retail. http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2009/08/24/public-supports-liverpool-city-centre-s-new-retail-revolution-92534-24514174/ It is easy to level weighted questions at the public and make headlines. We all know we needed a few shops but what is the need to keep on day after day publicising all the big businesses while small businesses go bust on a daily basis. They dont have PR budgets. http://www.liverpooldailypost.co.uk/liverpool-news/regional-news/2008/02/22/use-us-or-lose-us-plea-by-lewis-s-bosses-64375-20509063/ It needs something a little more clever than the kids at the local papers who are caught up in the whole retail therapeutic experience and have entered a 'culture' at the local papers where shops are king and shopping is the answer to all our dreams and desires. It really is not.
I run a small business and it has been tough recently, there are others who cant sit out the next few months like Grosvenor, with their huge resources.
But what about the future look of our city. One journalist down at the Oldham Echo recently asked another. "Do you know anything about Architecture and World Heritage"
"No but I will find someone who does"
So she phoned the pathetic world heritage officer John Hinchliffe and wrote an article that was so far unbalanced as to amount to be covering over the mistaken decisions to destroy the Site, that it was an anachronism of the truth..
IN ORDER TO BE REPORTING CULURE IT WOULD HELP TO BE CULTURED. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND IT. IF YOU HAVE TO PHONE A FRIEND IN THE LOCAL PR FIRM..........IT IS NO GOOD PRETENDING. Our future is being put on a PR platter in front of our very eyes and is being lapped up by the public, but hey we can always go shopping.
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
Peel Holdings-Asset Stripping Liverpool, Right In Front Of Your Eyes.
It was six months ago that I told the both local editors of the plans that were passed to build a new port in…Salford at a cost of 400 million. The local papers had conveniently misplaced the story to the “Ignorant to the facts” or "Just plain Ignorant" section of Trinity “smoking” Mirror Group at Oldham Hall Street. I wrote to both editors showing them the glaring disaster that was unfolding in front of their very eyes and criticized them heavily on these pages. Shouting of the need to get this out to the public as there were thousands of Liverpool jobs at stake. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/07/liver-peel-conflicts-of-interest-begin.html It was followed up with further writing http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/07/liverpeel.html and once an understanding of the way we were being manipulated was unravelled it all became a little too easy to see through those smoking mirrors. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/2009/07/is-daily-post-and-echo-mouthpiece-for.html We were being sold down the river to….Salford by a Tax Exile John Whitaker, the Chairman and owner of Peel, living in the Isle of Man. Peel should be investigated by the competition commission.
Then they play around with our fledgling Cruise business and we are supposed to believe they are anything other than asset strippers wanting to build flats on the World Heritage Site while allowing Trafalgar Docks to be filled in with the rubble from the underground car park of Chavasse park on Grosvenor-pool. http://liverpoolpreservationtrust.blogspot.com/search/label/Cruise%20Liner%20Jetty
Peter Elson today reports, and he has a good stab at it having taken time to get public opinion he writes.
INTEGRATING Liverpool docks and the Manchester Ship Canal for the first time will create a phenomenal transport and economic asset, claims Mersey Ports boss Gary Hodgson.
Mr Hodgson, Mersey Ports managing director, rejected all criticism that investing in the Manchester Ship Canal (MSC) would damage Liverpool’s maritime trade.
The new £400m Port Salford at the MSC terminus, Port Wirral and other interchanges on the 36-mile canal instead would boost Liverpool trade.
Peel Ports is poised to start work on its £200m Post-Panamax double river berth in 2011 to take bigger ships.
“We think next year will be right, but economic conditions will decide,” said Mr Hodgson.
“People do not realise how important this is to the city.
“We’ve spent £2m on site surveys and creating a good engineering plan.
“Construction will take about 18 months to two years.
“The port drives what this place is all about. We’re trying to do the right thing to create wealth and jobs. We’ve planned integrating Liverpool docks and Manchester Ship Canal into a 44-mile system for a long time.
“They complement each other, but it’s the first time this has happened since the MSC was opened in 1894.
“This is one of our key strategies. We’ll achieve the opposite of what people claim – that it’s bad for Liverpool. In fact, it’s good for the city.”
Peel’s plan is for giant container ships to berth at a new 800m quay outside Royal Seaforth Dock.
Containers would be unloaded onto smaller ships fitting the MSC’s locks for distribution along its 36 miles.
The Liverpool – MSC barge shuttle (including wine for Tesco) set a precedent in replacing road haulage.
“Our chairman John Whittaker is passionate about this integration. Nothing compares with its impact.
“The economic benefits are huge when linked into the rail, road and motorway network along the canal.
“About 15m people live within two hours of the port, so why do 60% of our containers come via Felixstowe?”
The Post-Panamax berth is unaffected by tides, and ships are not constrained by Gladstone Lock’s size.
Comments left are not as kind as Peter to Peel but he has done a good job in asking the questions to Peel Ports and bringing it to the attention of those who wish to comment.
Linnetlane wrote: How is it good for the city? It's becoming clear that Peel is asset stripping the port of Liverpool in order to support its assets elsewhere. As anyone who has been up the Manchester Ship Canal will verify most of the activity is within the Liverpool City Region (there's very little past Runcorn) that's because there isn't the demand from the market - it isn't as though the existing facilities at Irlam are run off their feet!Peel is just trying to maximise its assets by using the port of Liverpool as a conduit to breath life into its Port Salford scam - aided and abetted by NWDA. It's hard sometimes to tell them apart these days with the same people moving between both organisations.The question we need to ask is would this be occurring if someone else owned the Port of Liverpool? Obviously not! Why would anyone want to create jobs elsewhere when there is more than enough capacity to do everything from the existing facilities at Seaforth, and keep jobs within the Liverpool city region.As a private company Peel is free to do as it likes with its assets. However, this does not excuse the behaviour of local authorities and local media who collaborate with them against the Liverpool city region's best interests.What BTW is Port Wirral? In this the new name for the Port of Liverpool on the Wirral side of the water?6/4/2010 9:20 AM BST on liverpooldailypost.co.uk Recommended (15) Report Abuse Permalink
Mekanik59 wrote: DO PEEL THINK WE ARE ALL 'THICK'...They are literally 'shifting' our commerceto wherever...our docks and our waterfrontare in 'dangerous hands'...is our councilUNAWARE of this..6/4/2010 11:20 AM BST on liverpooldailypost.co.uk Recommended (5) Report Abuse Permalink
blogalot wrote: Why cant our local press and councillorstake a sensible 'in-depth' look intothese proposals....A panamax berth bringsNOTHING to our region when everything is 'BARGED' out to be handled 'ELSEWHERE' why cant you see that..storage and distribution will all be inWhittakers Salford...the NWDA and Network RailAND LORD Adonis are all working on this plan...this city is set to be another Southport...no jobsnothing...relying on a few OAP's to stop overnightin our hotels.....We are NOT just a touristdestination...are you listening NWDA/Peel..Weneed REAL jobs..6/4/2010 11:33 AM BST on liverpooldailypost.co.uk Recommended (6) Report Abuse Permalink
h2400blue wrote: Come on Mr Hodgson, surley you are not a complete plant pot, trying to get in on the cheap again on the back of Liverpool. It was only a month ago your company had so much to say about development at Liverpool for passenger facilities needless to say the only company using Langton Have given two years notice that they are pulling out of Liverpool (WELL DONE)So you want to open the Canal again The only Deep sea vessels ever to go all the way up the Canal Manchester Liners who operated a regular sevice to Canada years ago have finished, The use of Eastham locks at the entrance to the Canal in the main were used by Tankers Going to Q. E. 11. Dock at Eastham You still have a small number of Small chemical tankers going no futher than Moor sidings, The canal is probally silted up as you know, as the water becomes less bracish the further that you go up the canal the draft of the vessel will increse, you state that you have spent two million pounds on a fezability study . I think Peel need to study if you are worth employing. you are either being miss Quoted or your off yor Head.REGARDS6/4/2010 12:20 PM BST on liverpooldailypost.co.uk


