David ward writes;
I was asked the other day several questions about Elliot Developments, and one of those was quite clear.
Where Is The Money Coming From?
That is a question that keeps rearing its head every time a new development is announced by the Oldham Echo.
Why Don't They, The Liverpool Echo, raise any questions about how a new obscure developer can get so much of the land in Liverpool and earmark it for student shoeboxes.
So one development funds another in property circles but someone has to pay the wages and the money has to come from somewhere.
ONE DEVELOPMENT IN THE BALTIC TRIANGLE HAS TO HAVE A GENERATOR OUTSIDE ON THE PAVEMENT BECAUSE THERE IS NO ELECTRIC TO A BLOCK OF STUDENT FLATS.
How can the planners allow that to happen, nudge, nudge, wink, wink.
WILL THESE CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS PROVE TO BE THE BIGGEST PONZI PYRAMID SCHEME THE CITY HAS EVER KNOWN.
If Parliament intended section 14(1) (FoI Act) to contain the extensive
tests and criteria now applied under the authority of Dransfield, why were
those tests and criteria not enacted by Parliament in the Freedom of
Information Act 2000? Email to Rt. Hon Louise Haigh MP, from Alan Dransfield
-
The Rt Hon Louise Haigh MPFirst Secretary of StateChancellor of the Duchy
of LancasterMinister for the Cabinet Office Copy to:Simon Hoare MP, Chair,
Public...
No comments:
Post a Comment